-------------------------------------------------------------
China, open letter, May 2016
To:
xinfangchu@agri.gov.cn; sp@gxfda.gov.cn;
Cc:
english@mail.gov.cn; content@mail.gov.cn;
premier@mail.gov.cn; chineseembassyspokesperson@gmail.com, tangzhi@mail.gov.cn;
fab@npc.gov.cn; chinamissionun@gmail.com;
english@npc.gov.cn; wandi@china.org.cn;
zhu_jing3@mfa.gov.cn; yu_gang1@mfa.gov.cn;
zhu_xiahan@mfa.gov.cn; 314263122@qq.com;
Lin-lin-fan@hotmail.com; sun_rui@mfa.gov.cn;
guohongjun@chinacicc.org.cn; ye_wei@mfa.gov.cn;
FAOHN07@126.com; yu_zhoulin@mfa.gov.cn;
presscenter_china@mfa.gov.cn; pr@cdrf.org.cn;
pr@cdrf.org.cn; zhangsu123123@sina.com;
ggcskzxy@chinalaw.gov.cn; jinyj@nhfpc.gov.cn;
wjwfxjc@126.com; nhfpcsc@126.com; changwh@sda.gov.cn;
webmaster@china.org.cn; mofcom@mofcom.gov.cn;
emic@moe.edu.cn; webmaster@agri.gov.cn;
zxc@szhealth.gov.cn; manage@chsi.moh.gov.cn;
sun_zhen@mfa.gov.cn; zhang_yiqi@mfa.gov.cn;
gu_xiaodong@mfa.gov.cn;
chinacdc@public3.bta.net.cn; chinaculture@chinadaily.com.cn;
gazette@mail.gov.cn; info@china.org.cn;
suggestion@mail.gov.cn; xhzhang@cnta.gov.cn;
gzbtx@gxzf.gov.cn; wangmanwei@agri.gov.cn;
Xiajyuan@agri.gov.cn; wuxiaoling@agri.gov.cn;
zhaolijun@agri.gov.cn; wangyx@agri.gov.cn;
wangyiyu@aqsiq.gov.cn; yangyongzhen@agri.gov.cn;
ChinaMissionUN@Gmail.com; cpc@peopledaily.com.cn;
notice@scio.gov.cn; zhangdong@scio.gov.cn;
scio@scio.gov.cn; zgrd@npc.gov.cn; yux@gdd.gov.cn;
globalstar.guangzhou@gmail.com; caopinghua2014@gmail.com;
chinahealthgov@163.com; manage@moh.gov.cn;
english@gz.gov.cn; bgs@gxta.gov.cn; BGS@gxta.gov.cn;
business@chaochuang.com.cn; caibei1115@gmail.com;
cbm@jl.gov.cn; cdx@gxta.gov.cn; chinaartv@163.com;
chuguo@gdfao.gov.cn; contact@ebeijing.gov.cn;
courtoffice@sina.com; csq@gxta.gov.cn; cxh@gxta.gov.cn;
edu@hbfasc.com; faohn01@126.com; FAOHN07@126.com;
faohn09@126.com; faohn33@126.com; fenglei1889@163.com;
fmckxjb@126.com; fzq@gxta.gov.cn; gexinzheng@hch.org.cn;
gjw@gxi.gov.cn; guangzhoubwg@126.com;
guo_xiaofeng@mfa.gov.cn; gxfaocgc@163.com;
gxjxbyc@126.com; gxjxpy@126.com; gxlcdj@163.com;
gxlilan@163.com; gxrxjw@126.com; gxtgb@126.com;
gzajj@gz.gov.cn; gzcc@gzcc.gov.cn; gzii@gz.gov.cn;
gzpi@gzpi.gov.cn; gzqb@gz.gov.cn; gzsfj@gzsfj.gov.cn;
dyc@cnta.gov.cn; libinchu@gdfao.gov.cn; chuguo@gdfao.gov.cn;
qianzheng@gdfao.gov.cn; jiguan@gdfao.gov.cn;
shijianban@gdfao.gov.cn; visasectionvan@gmail.com;
enghunan@hunan.gov.cn; zgqxj@cma.gov.cn;
renshichu@gdfao.gov.cn; wangyk@agri.gov.cn;
zzjscjgc@agri.gov.cn; ccpr_qiao@agri.gov.cn;
ccpr@agri.gov.cn; mingzhu@agri.gov.cn;
wangyk@agri.gov.cn; info@uschina.org.cn;
zhaolijun@agri.gov.cn; yangyongzhen@agri.gov.cn;
jianghui@agri.gov.cn; sze@chimelong.com;
zhongfei_luntan@mfa.gov.cn; chris.ho@chimelong.com;
nzzd@agri.gov.cn; xhszbs@xinhuanet.com;
jbw@bjd.com.cn; info@peopledaily.com.cn;
gzsports@gz.gov.cn; gzstjj@gz.gov.cn; hbzfcg@126.com;
hch_hch@yeah.net; he_yan@mfa.gov.cn; hhyyjhn@126.com;
hjy@gxta.gov.cn; hl99@sina.com; hnwb@faohn.gov.cn;
guisheng@gxnews.com.cn; huachuanghui@hotmail.com;
huangsheng@gxta.gov.cn; hurthefeelings@gmail.com;
ijabe@sina.com; english@moe.edu.cn;
zfws@bjhr.gov.cn; service@ebeijing.gov.cn;
information@bjfao.gov.cn; webmaster_en@bjta.gov.cn;
chinaemb_nl@mfa.gov.cn; chinaemb_pt@mfa.gov.cn;
chinamission_eu@mfa.gov.cn; chinaemb_es@mfa.gov.cn;
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
亲爱的先生
近年来，在中国国内,特别是在广西壮族自治区的地区,保护动物权益活动家和那些支持年度玉林狗肉节的人之间不断有拔河战般的争斗。本次庆祝6月21日夏至活动中,报道将有4千只猫和一万只狗遭受折磨和残忍杀害.当地人把猫和狗的肉放在菜单上来供人选用。
从我看到的研究及报告说明，玉林狗肉节根本是基于腐败. 而当地政府不闻不问，让它随意发生。此外,由于缺乏旨在保护猫狗不受这种虐待的反动物虐待法, 玉林狗肉节在省内外的猫狗身上尽情谋取暴力。
外界看中国,认为中国是一个巨大的大国.世界几乎三分之一的人口居住在那里。但西方大部分人不明白为什么广西壮族自治区是一个自治省，拥有自己的当地政府和立法的权利。
对于西方人来说, 政府层次显得复杂。但是我希望中国好。很多西方人都希望中国好。
这也就是为什么今天我写信给你。我相信如果政府介入，把猫狗肉从玉林狗肉节的菜单中永久删除,是最符合中国利益的.
由于缺乏动物的反虐待法, 才出现这个节日及其相关的腐败现象- 这是一个法律漏洞。
当地人宣讲,说吃猫狗肉是他们的文化和传统. 但是应该有约束和限制。为什么要从家庭里偷宠物，在年幼的孩子面前公开虐待和残忍屠杀? 这种不人道的杀害和屠杀无辜的宠物是不利于中国的社会和道德发展的。而且盗贼从家庭里偷猫狗而并不受到惩罚,正义从何而来。
据悉，这个“节” 是为了刺激地方经济 ，与传统或健康益处无关。 这个所谓的'夏至荔枝狗肉节'只是一些个别企业和个人推出的. 而事实上这个节日不存在。 ” （纽约时报的文章
从顶部第二段）网址： http://nyti.ms/1FGxvuw
最后，无数游客都不敢来中国，因为他们读了玉林狗肉节的报道都很震惊和害怕。出于恐惧,这些游客错过了看到中国及其美丽的城市的辉煌，也不会体验到它的丰富的祖先和习俗。
先生，为了中国的缘故，请不要让让玉林狗肉节进一步损害中国的声誉。肉玉林狗肉节是建立在腐败和谎言上的节日. 就是一只猫或狗也不应该为此失去其生命. 从损害公众形象角度来看, 相比起中国的利益, 把狗肉和猫肉从节中删除所造成的经济损失要小得多。
真诚地
(name, address)
------------------------------------------------- Translation
Dear Sir
In recent years, in China, especially in the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, there have been a tug of war between the protection of war-like battle animal rights activists and those who support the annual Yulin dog section. The celebration of the summer solstice June 21 event, the reporter will have 4,000 cats and a million dogs suffer torture and cruel killing. Locals cats and dogs up meat on the menu for people to choose.
From what I see description of studies and reports, Yulin dog section is based on the fundamental corruption while local government indifferent, let it freely happen. Furthermore, the lack is designed to protect dogs and cats from this anti-animal cruelty law abuse, Yulin dog festival in cats and dogs outside the province who seek to enjoy violence.
Look outside China that China is a huge country. Almost a third of the world's population live. But most people do not understand why the West Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region is an autonomous province with its own legislation and the rights of local government.
For Westerners, government level too complicated. But I hope the Chinese better. Many Westerners want good Chinese.
This is why I am writing to you today. I believe that if government intervention, the cat dog permanently deleted from Yulin dog section in the menu that is most in line with China's interests.
Due to the lack of an animal anti-cruelty law, it appears relevant to this festival and its corruption - which is a legal loophole.
Locals proclaim that eat cats dog meat is their culture and traditions, but there should be restrictions and limitations. Why steal from family pets in front of young children disclosed abuse and cruel slaughter? Such inhuman killings and massacres of innocent pets are not conducive to China's social and moral development. And thieves stole from the family dogs and cats and is not punished, justice comes from.
It is reported that this "festival" is to stimulate the local economy, nothing to do with tradition or health benefits. This so-called 'summer solstice festival litchi dog' are just some of the individual companies and individuals introduced. In fact this festival does not exist. "(New York Times article
From the top of the second paragraph) Website: http://nyti.ms/1FGxvuw
Finally, many tourists are afraid to come to China, because they read the reports of Yulin dog section are shocked and afraid. Out of fear, these tourists miss seeing the beautiful city of China and its glory, it will not experience its rich ancestry and customs.
Sir, for China's sake, please do not let the dog let Yulin section further damage China's reputation. Yulin dog meat festival section is based on corruption and lies. Is a cat or dog should not lose their life for this from the perspective of public image damage, compared to China's interests, the dog and cat meat from economic losses caused by the deleted section is much smaller.
Sincerely
------------------------------------------------------
done. Thank you
ReplyDelete